![]() I don't know how you came to that conclusion unless you only read bits and pieces. Putting a set of commands in game so people can easily cheat when needed will more likely make them cheat in a similar way. ![]() It's kinda like "Can't clear it now? Want to buy a loot box and hope you get a +10 weapon so you can clear it?" which is what most modern games wish to do and it works unfortunately. The other meaning is the more important one, namely if you immediately offer help people will more likely become dependant on it, even if it isn't the act of helping but rather the feeling of being treated as being helped. It first means that, if people are always helped, they will more likely ask for, demand and expect help. ![]() Enjoy the game however you like, I guess.Įdit: it has a double meaning. If they cannot get up on their own they will always become dependant. Going easy on kids just because the fall. If I make the wrong move, apocalypse happens, so I know what you mean with it can be really difficult. xdĬonsidering I haven't restarted yet, I lack of armors and weapons from different playthroughs as well as upgrades other people have. HEs starting to show up next and beyond that WAWs, which is what I have most of. It's kinda like controlling the flow and outcome of a challenge which is something only the game master is supposed to do, not the player. A cheat or whatever modification changes the game completely. It's more about making it less appealing to do so and about hoping people would try to overcome the challenge the game gives them so that they can have the enjoyment the creators hope for. It's not really about stopping cheats from happening. Cheats used to be quite a fun way to play games as a kid, even if they where too hard, still fondly remember some of them, really helps if you got no gaming skills (yet) at that young age. Guess i should try day 48 or whatever it was again soon, and maybe get lucky this time. Well, that's my thoughts on the matter, anyway. I'm simply feeling too old to keep up with these insane challenges. As for me, i don't mind a challenge but i still want to be able to see it through to the end within reason. Some people want to test their skills, others prefer it more easygoing. Gives everyone the experience they desire without excluding people due to difficulty. Kinda the reason difficulty selections exist, now i think about it. Atleast for the story-related content anyway, non-story content with high difficulty ussually gets safely disregarded if it's too hard. This game can be really HARD, give people a little mercy will ya, not everyone has the insane skills to complete video games and yet they want to see it through to the end regardless, this is one way to achieve it and be satisfied. ![]() Some have more pure reasons for it anyway (not that purity matters as a reason in single-player games, though), they might want to just mess around and try things after feeling they've completed the game, or they might use it as a crutch to aid them in completing certain tasks they feel they just cannot live up to. Ultimately no point to it, it just causes bad blood between people when trying to go against it by blocking easy cheating attempts. Well, it's their choice, you'd be suprised how self-harming people can be in other habits just because it satisfies them (like say, eating junkfood), and yet no-one calls them out on that, eh? I mean, who's it gonna harm if a person decides to cheat in a single-player game? Harm the person you'd probably say? Seems really pointless to block cheating attempts, if you ask me. (there's already a wiki out there containing information for those who can't help themselves and obtain knowledge of what will happen before they should, breaking the experience of learning it oneself. Modifications, cheats of any kind could break that balance and the unexpected. Personally, one of the parts I find fun about the game is it's risk and difficulty. Just having had the commands once would be enough to develop some kind of cheat even when they are blocked out later, because the function that enabled the commands would probably not be removed. It's always a question, especially outside of your team about who you can trust. Even if the culprit is a legit translator, he/she could still do that in the end. I mean, the original poster for example could easily 'pretend' to be a translator and obtain what he/she desires that way, then spread the information he obtained on reddit or something. It sounds a little bit risky for the developer team this way, which is why I asked. (I somehow assumed that there would be comments or something. I guess that means that there isn't a clear description elsewhere.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |